You have several options open to you if you feel you have been cheated in a real estate transaction. While some people argue that real estate purchasers are equally consumers and should have several rights under the consumer protection laws, I strongly believe it is quite dangerous and time wasting to seek redress under relevant consumer protection laws where real estate transactions is involved.
According to the business dictionary, a consumer is a purchaser of a good or service in retail; an end user and not necessarily a purchaser in the distribution of goods and services. If this is the case, the question is; does a purchaser of real estate product falls under the contemplated meaning of a consumer or not? Can such purchaser of real estate product be covered under the relevant protection law? If a consumer is a purchaser of a good or service and the Sales of Goods Act does not expressly cover real properties, does it imply that the purchaser is not covered?
I would rather advice that a purchaser of real estate product who feels cheated can seek redress at the following places:
This article was composed & written by:
Damola Aroyewun,
Lead Partner, Capital Ace Attorneys
.jpg)
d.aroyewun@capitalaceattorneys.com
+234-815-261-2913